I don’t have a problem letting you guys argue about politics here this page was created to keep this off of the rest of the site. I don’t read this forum and rely mostly on the people that do to let me know when something gets out of hand.
We will not tolerate anyone threatening anyone else with any type of violence kidding or not kidding. This goes for blatant and veiled threats alike.
If you choose to do so I will immediately remove you from the site. If it becomes a problem I am more than happy to get rid of this page and not allow any politics anywhere on the site.
I would remove the politics if I were you. The site is called Charleston Fishing. Leave the conversations to fishing and hunting, most of us prepare our catch/kill, so the cooking section would need to stay.
Dang, got out for a couple of hours and miss something good! Someone, PM me the particulars:wink: Ain’t very often, Admin threatens us! Guess whoever it was, doing whatever they did, knows who the Big Dog is now!
I would remove the politics if I were you. The site is called Charleston Fishing. Leave the conversations to fishing and hunting, most of us prepare our catch/kill, so the cooking section would need to stay.
If not, a moderator is seriously in need.
Since you brought this up. Why do you post so much in this section ? Your statement seems extremely hypocritical. Just like a radio station, don’t like it don’t tune into it.
Out of curiosity what is it you think needs a moderator? I think we all know why admin put up this sticky and provided moderation on the clowns that got too carried away with threats on one another.
Was it not you and fritz that called me an asshat ignorant redneck in attempted seriousness ? I liked the redneck name, but had to google asshat. That was a little offensive but I took it from the source and laughed.
Lighten up bolbie, toppy, Polly , Robert. . Life is good my friend!
Some of this made me chuckle. Especially Easy’s comments about being gone for a minute.
Reading Fred’s comment, I wonder if there is any chance you guys would agree to completely disallowing, self-moderated, name calling? No more Dorito, asshats, snowflakes, Rebulican’ts, Libtards, etc. Just respectful conversation and opposing views. Is it possible that respecting each other could be a ground rule?
If anyone calls anyone a name, CF-member/candidate/etc, we all agree to hammer them for the disrespectful act?
Some of this made me chuckle. Especially Easy’s comments about being gone for a minute.
Reading Fred’s comment, I wonder if there is any chance you guys would agree to completely disallowing, self-moderated, name calling? No more Dorito, asshats, snowflakes, Rebulican’ts, Libtards, etc. Just respectful conversation and opposing views. Is it possible that respecting each other could be a ground rule?
If anyone calls anyone a name, CF-member/candidate/etc, we all agree to hammer them for the disrespectful act?
Some of this made me chuckle. Especially Easy’s comments about being gone for a minute.
Reading Fred’s comment, I wonder if there is any chance you guys would agree to completely disallowing, self-moderated, name calling? No more Dorito, asshats, snowflakes, Rebulican’ts, Libtards, etc. Just respectful conversation and opposing views. Is it possible that respecting each other could be a ground rule?
If anyone calls anyone a name, CF-member/candidate/etc, we all agree to hammer them for the disrespectful act?
Any chance that would gain consensus?
BG
That's where a moderator steps in.
Nah man… this idea is about self-moderation and commitment to respecting each other. I am not for asking Andy to step in where our parents failed.
Some of this made me chuckle. Especially Easy’s comments about being gone for a minute.
Reading Fred’s comment, I wonder if there is any chance you guys would agree to completely disallowing, self-moderated, name calling? No more Dorito, asshats, snowflakes, Rebulican’ts, Libtards, etc. Just respectful conversation and opposing views. Is it possible that respecting each other could be a ground rule?
If anyone calls anyone a name, CF-member/candidate/etc, we all agree to hammer them for the disrespectful act?
Any chance that would gain consensus?
BG
That's where a moderator steps in.
Nah man… this idea is about self-moderation and commitment to respecting each other. I am not for asking Andy to step in where our parents failed.
BG
Not fair for Andy to have to monitor the site 24/7 .
Good luck having one show respect after a few bourbons, and deciding to go on a late night rant.
Some of this made me chuckle. Especially Easy’s comments about being gone for a minute.
Reading Fred’s comment, I wonder if there is any chance you guys would agree to completely disallowing, self-moderated, name calling? No more Dorito, asshats, snowflakes, Rebulican’ts, Libtards, etc. Just respectful conversation and opposing views. Is it possible that respecting each other could be a ground rule?
If anyone calls anyone a name, CF-member/candidate/etc, we all agree to hammer them for the disrespectful act?
Any chance that would gain consensus?
BG
That's where a moderator steps in.
Nah man… this idea is about self-moderation and commitment to respecting each other. I am not for asking Andy to step in where our parents failed.
BG
Not fair for Andy to have to monitor the site 24/7 .
Good luck having one show respect after a few bourbons, and deciding to go on a late night rant.
But if we all agree to hammer that guy, in a bi-partisan way, it’ll self correct.
The Administrator is like my wife, I never win the debate & they always have the final word. Censor if you must but I’d prefer to leave it up. It’s nice to know there are some like-minded rebels out there. I enjoy the banter, what’s it hurtin’, most of it makes me have a laugh & we all take turns being in the pickle barrel.
. Life is good my friend!