quote:
Originally posted by Richard Beer Froth
Clem sure does seem to know a lot about the subject, and still failed the tests…
http://newsstand.clemson.edu/mediarelations/clemson-researcher-warns-of-spread-of-homemade-steroids/
Reality is the NCAA should have tested all the Clem players when they retested DL… Until then, Clem has 3 football NCs, with 3 asterisks beside them all in the eyes of the national public… However, the Clem folks will still celebrate their inbreeding and cheating heritage…
RBF
Uhmm, they didn’t retest DL. The B sample was the same as the original sample, just tested at a different time to see if an anomaly or flaw was in the original test. Clemson has 3 NC, probably have as many as ND by the time ND gets another shot at the playoffs.
Mark
Southport 28TE
2X Yamaha F250
Yeah, but do you consider a dog to be a filthy animal? I wouldn’t go so far as to call a dog filthy but they’re definitely dirty. But, a dog’s got personality. Personality goes a long way.
“Life’s tough…It’s even tougher if you’re stupid” John Wayne
quote:
Originally posted by saltydog235
Uhmm, they didn’t retest DL. The B sample was the same as the original sample, just tested at a different time to see if an anomaly or flaw was in the original test. Clemson has 3 NC, probably have as many as ND by the time ND gets another shot at the playoffs.
Yes, that’s called a “retest” of the same sample… And again, they should have tested the whole team…
Who cares about ND, SCar will 611 Dabo and Clem…
RBF
LMAO!!! Winner! Winner!
“You don’t always know where you stand till you know that you won’t run away.” ~Slipknot
It’s not talking crap if you can back it up…and nothing can back it up better than facts.
3 months into the investigation with nothing. Is Mueller running this one also?
After being released, a lot of fish die, but a lot of them live also.
This won’t even be in the news by tomorrow.
After being released, a lot of fish die, but a lot of them live also.
quote:
Originally posted by CaptFritz
This won’t even be in the news by tomorrow.
After being released, a lot of fish die, but a lot of them live also.
It shouldn’t be, they had a trace amount in their system. Even the Subject Matter Experts say that if a trace amount is found, then it shouldn’t be a positive test. This is just the NCAA trying to use the little bit of power that they still have.
“World Anti-Doping Agency recently recommended that in cases where trace amounts of ostarine are found, no positive findings be made. The U.S. Anti-Doping Agency has also lifted suspensions against five athletes who tested positive for trace levels of ostarine.”
Thanks for the explanation, I can see it clearly now.
After being released, a lot of fish die, but a lot of them live also.
quote:
Originally posted by Clem1984
quote:
Originally posted by CaptFritz
This won’t even be in the news by tomorrow.
After being released, a lot of fish die, but a lot of them live also.
It shouldn’t be, they had a trace amount in their system. Even the Subject Matter Experts say that if a trace amount is found, then it shouldn’t be a positive test. This is just the NCAA trying to use the little bit of power that they still have.
“World Anti-Doping Agency recently recommended that in cases where trace amounts of ostarine are found, no positive findings be made. The U.S. Anti-Doping Agency has also lifted suspensions against five athletes who tested positive for trace levels of ostarine.”
So if someone takes a drug test for their employer and a “trace amount” of cocaine or a “trace amount” of meth or a “trace amount” of heroin is found in their sample, it shouldn’t be considered a positive drug test? Or is this more a matter of it shouldn’t be viewed as a positive drug test if it was YOUR sample?
“You don’t always know where you stand till you know that you won’t run away.” ~Slipknot
They know what happened but privacy laws prevent them from telling the public.
After being released, a lot of fish die, but a lot of them live also.
