Drone Surveillance

http://www.sportfishingmag.com/blogs/hook/eye-sky

Eye in the Sky: Anglers Under Surveillance

by Sam Hudson

Puma-AE

Enlarge Photo

www.avinc.com

The Puma AE, an unmanned aircraft drone, has been used by FWC officers to help issue citations.

Our national government uses drones to spy on potential terrorist suspects. Scientists operate unmanned aircraft to study nature from above. And in Australia, unmanned drones are set to patrol the beaches for sharks during the summer months. The eye in the sky is a valuable commodity.

But growing reports suggest that NOAA Fisheries, the Coast Guard, and state agencies like the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission are utilizing unmanned drones for a different purpose ? to spy on you during your fishing trips. Each of these agencies has the ability to deploy drones and issue tickets for federal fishing violations.

“We are currently studying the effectiveness in drones and how much we want to invest in them,” said Otha Easley, a supervisory criminal investigator at NOAA’s Southeast Enforcement Division. Easley was speaking with a writer at The Bradenton Herald. “There have been citations for different restrictions such as no fishing zones, no motor zones, and fishery violations. A vessel can be observed by drone, airplane or vessel, and often times this requires the officers to investigate first hand to confirm a violation.”

In October 2012, a report by the FWC Division of Law Enforcement cited work with drones:

The vessel Peter Gladding and crew along with NOAA officials spent six days in the Dry Tortugas testing an unmanned, remote-controlled drone called the Puma AE. The Puma AE captures images, video, and has infrared capabilities. During the test flight, it was used to map corals, locate turtles and track migrating birds.

While in flight, the small aircraft Puma AE is extremely stealthy and can barely be seen or heard. It can be launched, operated, and recovered from small vessels. Because of its numerous at

Man, can’t even take a leak. Sure it is an invasion of privacy. It takes a officer to operate the drone, he could just operate a boat. He will need a boat anyway to insure what he thought he saw. It’s like airplanes to catch speeders, you still need officers in cars to run them down and ticket them. They would waist a lot of valuable time watching me, unless they put it on America’s funniest video’s.

‘87 Pacemaker 31’ SF
‘04 Renegade 29’ 2 225’s
‘97 Maycraft 17’ 40 hp

quote:
Originally posted by mattc14

Man, can’t even take a leak. Sure it is an invasion of privacy. It takes a officer to operate the drone, he could just operate a boat. He will need a boat anyway to insure what he thought he saw. It’s like airplanes to catch speeders, you still need officers in cars to run them down and ticket them. They would waist a lot of valuable time watching me, unless they put it on America’s funniest video’s.

‘87 Pacemaker 31’ SF
‘04 Renegade 29’ 2 225’s
‘97 Maycraft 17’ 40 hp


I’m with you on the invasion of privacy aspect, and I worry about the slippery slope. But as of now, I think we are talking about illegal long liners, trawlers, and bandit boats. Look at some of the recent cases of boats from Mexico coming into south Texas and loading up on snapper/grouper.

quote:
Originally posted by mattc14

It takes a officer to operate the drone, he could just operate a boat.


</font id=“quote”></blockquote id=“quote”>

No No No, he might damage his equipment or get stuck going out there when it’s not worth it.

:flushed:

Bang Bang Boom Boom!

I wonder what the law is as it pertains to drones? What would be the charge for shooting one out of the shy?

ZX

I was thinking about putting a sign on my t-top warning of a no fly zone, no trespassing, drone will be used as target practice.
My home may also get one.

When the judge asks, I can say they were warned and take my ticket for discharging a weapon in city limits.