Freefish, that is some very large dreaming if you think that will possibly happen. I certainly admire your enthusiasm, ambitions and desires, and it makes perfect sense, but dealing with our government agencies is like herding cats, and good sense has no role.
I first got into the charter boat business in the 1970s and I attended every SAFMC public hearing within 100 miles of me from then until the mid 1990s. No matter what we had to say, no matter how much sense it made, we were never able to change a thing. The hearings consisted of them listening to our sound reasoning, ignoring it, and then us hearing what they were going to do in spite of it. The outcome was decided before the hearings, they aren’t interested in what we think. I got tired of fighting them, never won a round, but I wish you the best of luck 
I suspect you may have an easier time solving the Iran nuclear problem than doing what you propose, but if you have the time and energy, go for it. I just don’t anymore.
You started this thread asking an impossible question to answer, sorry for the derailment.
quote:
Does anyone have any idea how many recreational boats are bottomfishing in federal waters out of SC?
To make that meaningful you would also have to know how many days a week or a year each boat fished. We could have 10,000 boats who fish 1 or 2 days a year, or 5000 boats fishing 10 days a year or 500 boats fishing 100 days a year, the pressure would be the same. How often would be more important than how many, because people who go often usually will catch more fish than those who don’t.
Anyway, good luck with your mission 
Edit: And speaking of herding cats, we can’t even get 2 fishermen to agree on whether LORAN was worth keeping, much less what we need to do about fishery laws
They best solution that I see is voting t