quote:
Originally posted by Grady18I dont have any science or good explanation why but just seem that way to me.
NOTHING AGAINST YOU GRADY. I agree with you, but… your quote sounds like the methodology in which the SAFMC gets their data. They don’t have any “scientific” data to support their claims of overfishing. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to know that BSB’s ARS, and Grouper are more plentiful than ever and have been long before any of these new regulations were implemented. Went to a scoping meeting a few years ago and they kept referring to “the best available data” when quoting overfishing statistics and recreational catches. When I queried them one how they obtained their data, they could not/would not answer. I asked them if they actually spent time in a boat in the Jetties stopping fishermen coming back from offshore to ask them what they caught and how many, and they all gave the 30yd stare! While these meetings may seem to be or feel productive, it is only productive for the SAFMC as they are required to have a certain number of “public forums,” if you will, to satisfy the gov’t policy before implementing new regulations. They already have their minds made up before the meetings, or else there wouldn’t be a need for the meeting! Seriously, are they going to have a meeting about how long the BSB, Grouper, ARS season should be, and then someone in the corner says “you know, I wish we could catch more BSB’s” and then all of a sudden the subject changes to catch limits for BSBs? I doubt it.