SCDNR sheepshead public meeting 10/17/11

Many thanks to Mel Bell, Robery Boyles, Angus McBride and a handful of other DNR biologists for the great discussion last night. After painting a life cycle picture of the sheepshead Mel went on to explain how, after Jan 1, 2012, there will be NO regulations on sheepshead in SC. That is inshore, nearshore and offshore. DNR will make a recommendation to the SC legislature that SC adopt a 12" min and a bag limit of 10 per person per day for recreational fishing, state and federal waters. This is based on the fact that the vast majority of sheepshead become mature by the time they reach 12" and spawn regularly. One hiccup here, our legislature has then got to approve this recommendation for this to become law and on the books. This could happen the first of the year, it could be delayed until the summer session or it could be voted down (depending on how the law is presented). All fishing regulations in SC are mandated by law, not just by DNR’s recommendation. This means we need to contact our representatives and encourage them to pass this resolution.
One thing that still worries me a little is the commercial sheepshead fishery. right now the commercial licensing in SC is so strictly regulated that there is only an annual commercial harvest of 300-400lbs per year. Florida and NC have much larger commercial harvests.
Kudos to SCDNR for getting “out in front” of the sheepshead regulation issue. I had a nice conversation with Robert Boyles afterwards and I told him it feels good knowing our state resources are being proactive in the fight to regulate this fishery and keep it viable for many years to come.
On a down side though I expected to see a lot more people there last night. Saltfisher and I both felt like that auditorium should have been full. Of the approx 15 people there, nearly half of them were DNR.
Bottom line is let’s encourage our state reps to make this into law and protects this fishery. Thanks DNR, you are on the right track.

The Morris Island Lighthouse www.savethelight.org

12", 10 fish seems reasonable to me. Bonzo?

peapod digs Officer Angus. nice to me, my kids, and answers all our dumb questions when we see him on the water.

after seeing the science behind their life cycles last night I fully support 12" min and 10 bag limit…

The Morris Island Lighthouse www.savethelight.org

Bonzo you were there so was I… I was the only kid in the room…

“In every species of fish I’ve angled for, it is the ones that have got away that thrill me the most, the ones that keep fresh in my memory. So I say it is good to lose fish. If we didn’t, much of the thrill of angling would be gone.” Ray Bergman

quote:
Originally posted by RiverMonster

Bonzo you were there so was I… I was the only kid in the room…


</font id=“quote”></blockquote id=“quote”>

glad you came…we need younger people involved in this as well…I was the question asking fool down front by the big guy :wink:

The Morris Island Lighthouse www.savethelight.org

thanks for coming River, me and bonzo were on the front row, at our age we sit close so we can hear

The wife and I was there also. We were on the same row as you monster. Like you Bonzo I haven’t been fishing for the bandits long but enjoy the challenge. I see no harm in a 12" 10 fish limit. Know a few people that have issues with it but they don’t understand what we were shown and what was discussed.

1720 KW 110 Johnson
16’ Bonito 65 Johnson

Who needs to keep 20 fish any way?

“In every species of fish I’ve angled for, it is the ones that have got away that thrill me the most, the ones that keep fresh in my memory. So I say it is good to lose fish. If we didn’t, much of the thrill of angling would be gone.” Ray Bergman

Unfortunately there are those that will keep 20 because the book says they can. There are also people who say if it is big enough to bite the hook it is big enough to keep. I think those are called sandwich fish. I have never caught my limit of anything and that doesn’t bother me at all.

1720 KW 110 Johnson
16’ Bonito 65 Johnson