Dexter Lawrence said he doesn’t take supplements and doesn’t even like taking the stuff clemson gives him. His words, not mine. Coaches drugging players without their knowledge is a lawsuit in the making IMO.
After being released, a lot of fish die, but a lot of them live also.
quote:
Originally posted by SCARCHER220Obviously it is a violation. Common sense would tell you that if this kid was doing this substance intentionally or regularly, he would have been caught way before a CFP game and in a much greater amount. I did some PED’s back in the day and it shows up if you use on a regular basis. Can you really believe that this future NFL starter was doing this on a regular basis? If so, you are not very smart. The odds are that if the players were in fact “dirty”, they would be caught.
" It is what it is".
It’s not a mater of what you or I “think” or “believe.” It’s a matter of what the facts are (sorry, salty) and the facts are a banned/illegal substance was found in the systems of three Clemson football players and that is a violation of NCAA policy.
I’m not judging these kids but in this case, the definition of “dirty” is having a specimen sample that contains an illegal/banned substance. The facts would support the claims these three players were in fact “dirty.” Speculation can be (and is being) made about the “amount” or where the Ostarine came from but the fact remains that Ostarine, an illegal/banned substance, was present in their systems. Spin it however you want but the facts are indisputable.
“You don’t always know where you stand till you know that you won’t run away.” ~Slipknot
It’s not talking crap if you can back it up…and nothing can back it up better than facts.
All this whining and crying is great. It must really suck to see your rival on top. I sure am glad I’m a Clemson fan and won’t ever have to experience that feeling.
Mark
Southport 28TE
2X Yamaha F250
Yeah, but do you consider a dog to be a filthy animal? I wouldn’t go so far as to call a dog filthy but they’re definitely dirty. But, a dog’s got personality. Personality goes a long way.
“Life’s tough…It’s even tougher if you’re stupid” John Wayne
Fritz law is your true calling. I say you drop off the face of the earth…get your law degree from Carolina, and blow the top off this thing.
quote:
Originally posted by bangstickquote:
Originally posted by SCARCHER220Obviously it is a violation. Common sense would tell you that if this kid was doing this substance intentionally or regularly, he would have been caught way before a CFP game and in a much greater amount. I did some PED’s back in the day and it shows up if you use on a regular basis. Can you really believe that this future NFL starter was doing this on a regular basis? If so, you are not very smart. The odds are that if the players were in fact “dirty”, they would be caught.
" It is what it is".
It’s not a mater</font id=“red”> of what you or I “think” or “believe.” It’s a matter of what the facts are (sorry, salty) and the facts are a banned/illegal substance was found in the systems of three Clemson football players and that is a violation of NCAA policy.
I’m not judging these kids but in this case, the definition of “dirty” is having a specimen sample that contains an illegal/banned substance. The facts would support the claims these three players were in fact “dirty.” Speculation can be (and is being) made about the “amount” or where the Ostarine came from but the fact remains that Ostarine, an illegal/banned substance, was present in their systems. Spin it however you want but the facts are indisputable.
“You don’t always know where you stand till you know that you won’t run away.” ~Slipknot
It’s not talking crap if you can back it up…and nothing can back it up better than facts.
'maters are what we eat down here, come summer. And, your use of the “comma” seems distressed? What gives
quote:
Originally posted by CaptFritzDexter Lawrence said he doesn’t take supplements and doesn’t even like taking the stuff clemson gives him. His words, not mine. Coaches drugging players without their knowledge is a lawsuit in the making IMO.
After being released, a lot of fish die, but a lot of them live also.
You sure let THE CHAMPS occupy a lot of your mind/time apparently…I’m a Clemson fan and have watched the interviews, read the articles repeatedly, and can’t find a quote that says that. If you have a reference, I’d love to see it.
Wadmalaw native
16’ Bentz-Craft Flats Boat
Not to change the subject and interrupt Fritz in his trolling career, but if you didn’t see this Youtube video, it’s pretty funny and probably pretty accurate!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ByunXo3Zk9E
One Simple Thanks!!
http://www.militaryappreciationday.org
quote:
Originally posted by bangstickquote:
Originally posted by SCARCHER220Obviously it is a violation. Common sense would tell you that if this kid was doing this substance intentionally or regularly, he would have been caught way before a CFP game and in a much greater amount. I did some PED’s back in the day and it shows up if you use on a regular basis. Can you really believe that this future NFL starter was doing this on a regular basis? If so, you are not very smart. The odds are that if the players were in fact “dirty”, they would be caught.
" It is what it is".
It’s not a mater of what you or I “think” or “believe.” It’s a matter of what the facts are (sorry, salty) and the facts are a banned/illegal substance was found in the systems of three Clemson football players and that is a violation of NCAA policy.
I’m not judging these kids but in this case, the definition of “dirty” is having a specimen sample that contains an illegal/banned substance. The facts would support the claims these three players were in fact “dirty.” Speculation can be (and is being) made about the “amount” or where the Ostarine came from but the fact remains that Ostarine, an illegal/banned substance, was present in their systems. Spin it however you want but the facts are indisputable.
“You don’t always know where you stand till you know that you won’t run away.” ~Slipknot
It’s not talking crap if you can back it up…and nothing can back it up better than facts.
I never disputed the facts. Yes they tested positive or dirty, whichever makes you feel more like a man to say and were punished for it. N
quote:
Originally posted by Mixed Nutzquote:
Originally posted by bangstickquote:
Originally posted by SCARCHER220Obviously it is a violation. Common sense would tell you that if this kid was doing this substance intentionally or regularly, he would have been caught way before a CFP game and in a much greater amount. I did some PED’s back in the day and it shows up if you use on a regular basis. Can you really believe that this future NFL starter was doing this on a regular basis? If so, you are not very smart. The odds are that if the players were in fact “dirty”, they would be caught.
" It is what it is".
It’s not a mater</font id=“red”> of what you or I “think” or “believe.” It’s a matter of what the facts are (sorry, salty) and the facts are a banned/illegal substance was found in the systems of three Clemson football players and that is a violation of NCAA policy.
I’m not judging these kids but in this case, the definition of “dirty” is having a specimen sample that contains an illegal/banned substance. The facts would support the claims these three players were in fact “dirty.” Speculation can be (and is being) made about the “amount” or where the Ostarine came from but the fact remains that Ostarine, an illegal/banned substance, was present in their systems. Spin it however you want but the facts are indisputable.
“You don’t always know where you stand till you know that you won’t run away.” ~Slipknot
It’s not talking crap if you can back it up…and nothing can back it up better than facts.
<hr height="1" no
quote:
Originally posted by SCARCHER220quote:
Originally posted by bangstickquote:
Originally posted by SCARCHER220Obviously it is a violation. Common sense would tell you that if this kid was doing this substance intentionally or regularly, he would have been caught way before a CFP game and in a much greater amount. I did some PED’s back in the day and it shows up if you use on a regular basis. Can you really believe that this future NFL starter was doing this on a regular basis? If so, you are not very smart. The odds are that if the players were in fact “dirty”, they would be caught.
" It is what it is".
It’s not a mater of what you or I “think” or “believe.” It’s a matter of what the facts are (sorry, salty) and the facts are a banned/illegal substance was found in the systems of three Clemson football players and that is a violation of NCAA policy.
I’m not judging these kids but in this case, the definition of “dirty” is having a specimen sample that contains an illegal/banned substance. The facts would support the claims these three players were in fact “dirty.” Speculation can be (and is being) made about the “amount” or where the Ostarine came from but the fact remains that Ostarine, an illegal/banned substance, was present in their systems. Spin it however you want but the facts are indisputable.
“You don’t always know where you stand till you know that you won’t run away.” ~Slipknot
It’s not talking crap if you can back it up…and nothing can back it up better than facts.
</font id="quote
OJ, no pun intended, has been hired by Dabs to help solve the case.
After being released, a lot of fish die, but a lot of them live also.
quote:
Originally posted by bangstickquote:
Originally posted by SCARCHER220quote:
Originally posted by bangstickquote:
Originally posted by SCARCHER220Obviously it is a violation. Common sense would tell you that if this kid was doing this substance intentionally or regularly, he would have been caught way before a CFP game and in a much greater amount. I did some PED’s back in the day and it shows up if you use on a regular basis. Can you really believe that this future NFL starter was doing this on a regular basis? If so, you are not very smart. The odds are that if the players were in fact “dirty”, they would be caught.
" It is what it is".
It’s not a mater of what you or I “think” or “believe.” It’s a matter of what the facts are (sorry, salty) and the facts are a banned/illegal substance was found in the systems of three Clemson football players and that is a violation of NCAA policy.
I’m not judging these kids but in this case, the definition of “dirty” is having a specimen sample that contains an illegal/banned substance. The facts would support the claims these three players were in fact “dirty.” Speculation can be (and is being) made about the “amount” or where the Ostarine came from but the fact remains that Ostarine, an illegal/banned substance, was present in their systems. Spin it however you want but the facts are indisputable.
"You don’t always know where you stand till you know that you won’t
That got a bit long winded. I’ll read it tonight. I’m getting some dang good rest these days. These posts are like Gotcha got involved in the Sports forum, nothing against Gotcha on his political rants. The Sports Forum should be simpler though.
Yep, Clemson’s still the Champs and 6-10 is on the way.
Mark
Southport 28TE
2X Yamaha F250
Yeah, but do you consider a dog to be a filthy animal? I wouldn’t go so far as to call a dog filthy but they’re definitely dirty. But, a dog’s got personality. Personality goes a long way.
“Life’s tough…It’s even tougher if you’re stupid” John Wayne
quote:
Originally posted by SCARCHER220quote:
Originally posted by bangstickquote:
Originally posted by SCARCHER220quote:
Originally posted by bangstickquote:
Originally posted by SCARCHER220Obviously it is a violation. Common sense would tell you that if this kid was doing this substance intentionally or regularly, he would have been caught way before a CFP game and in a much greater amount. I did some PED’s back in the day and it shows up if you use on a regular basis. Can you really believe that this future NFL starter was doing this on a regular basis? If so, you are not very smart. The odds are that if the players were in fact “dirty”, they would be caught.
" It is what it is".
It’s not a mater of what you or I “think” or “believe.” It’s a matter of what the facts are (sorry, salty) and the facts are a banned/illegal substance was found in the systems of three Clemson football players and that is a violation of NCAA policy.
I’m not judging these kids but in this case, the definition of “dirty” is having a specimen sample that contains an illegal/banned substance. The facts would support the claims these three players were in fact “dirty.” Speculation can be (and is being) made about the “amount” or where the Ostarine came from but the fact remains that Ostarine, an illegal/banned subs
quote:
Originally posted by bangstickquote:
Originally posted by Mixed Nutzquote:
Originally posted by bangstickquote:
Originally posted by SCARCHER220Obviously it is a violation. Common sense would tell you that if this kid was doing this substance intentionally or regularly, he would have been caught way before a CFP game and in a much greater amount. I did some PED’s back in the day and it shows up if you use on a regular basis. Can you really believe that this future NFL starter was doing this on a regular basis? If so, you are not very smart. The odds are that if the players were in fact “dirty”, they would be caught.
" It is what it is".
It’s not a mater</font id=“red”> of what you or I “think” or “believe.” It’s a matter of what the facts are (sorry, salty) and the facts are a banned/illegal substance was found in the systems of three Clemson football players and that is a violation of NCAA policy.
I’m not judging these kids but in this case, the definition of “dirty” is having a specimen sample that contains an illegal/banned substance. The facts would support the claims these three players were in fact “dirty.” Speculation can be (and is being) made about the “amount” or where the Ostarine came from but the fact remains that Ostarine, an illegal/banned substance, was present in their systems. Spin it however you want but the facts are indisputable.
"You don’t always know where you st
Looks like you’re not having a problem posting on the clock? The “taxpayer funded” clock?
Is that “Sauce” more becoming?
Whoever said I was any kind of government employee? I mentioned my wife is a government employee and several of our friends are government employees but I’ve never said or “admitted” I was a government employee, essential or nonessential. You should probably police yourself a little better and stay off of public forums after you’ve unscrewed the cap from your Night Train.
See, you were so eager to take a jab that you didn’t take the time to get your FACTS right. How predictably typical of you. Your jaws just can’t catch a break because of how often you’re constantly cramming your foot in your mouth. I won’t even begin to assume to know how beat to death your ass is because of how often you’re cramming your head in there.
No, that sauce was no less weak or more becoming. Thanks for the laugh though. You make this so easy I almost feel bad…almost. Oh, and don’t worry. You’ll always be “non-essential” to me, puddin’. 
“You don’t always know where you stand till you know that you won’t run away.” ~Slipknot
It’s not talking crap if you can back it up…and nothing can back it up better than facts.