Some of the guys from charlston think they own the atlantic ocean, believe me I know, dont post the Pic.
I’m not sure who “Bud” is ? but I did listen to a great deal of the testimony. When they asked the medical examiner was there and DNA found in the car She said hairs belonging to the child. When asked was that uncommon for any family’s vehicle he said no. When asked if they found any blood or fluids that would indicated decompisition he said no. When asked about the duct tape he said there were no finger prints or DNA from the mother on the tape. The police investigator said no finger prints,foot prints, No duct tape found in per posession, no blood, no witnesses of any kind. Searches on a computer doesn’t mean she did the searches or that she actually did the killing. They didn’t charge her with illegially transporting a body so even if she did dispose of it in her car it doesn’t mean she did the actual killing. Whoreing around makes you a whore not a killer. Do I think she did it? absolutely, but it’s the systems fault not the juriors. When you can through out direct blood evidence because the warrant was for the house not the garage as in the OJ case that’s where the problems stem from. Our Lawmaker/Lawyers made the system that let her go. Place your anger where it belongs.
quote:
Originally posted by scfisherman89Ready to see a citation written from this photographic evidence. Oh wait, ITS NOT GONNA HAPPEN yall go fishing and quit bitcching
17" War Eagle 25 Mercury
17" Boston Whaler Montauk 90 yamaha
put a date next to the picture…
wow
17" War Eagle 25 Mercury
17" Boston Whaler Montauk 90 yamaha
everyone on this discussion board sounds like they are very bored at work.
Murrells Inlet, SC