ALWAYS beats good offense. Just ask Clemzzzon 
. Hardly anybody gave the Seahawks a chance. I was one of the few 
Key West 1720 115 HP Johnson Saltwater.
While there is no doubt Seattleâs D played a major role in the win, Denver did nothing to help itself. Turnovers, an O line that couldnât adequately protect Manning and crappy special teams had a part in that loss. The tone was set with the first snap. Should have just taken a 2 - 0 loss at that point.
âApathy is the Glove in Which Evil Slips Itâs Handâ.
quote:So you just , pretty much , explained what a great defense causes a good offense to do??????
Originally posted by DFreedomWhile there is no doubt Seattleâs D played a major role in the win, Denver did nothing to help itself. Turnovers, an O line that couldnât adequately protect Manning and crappy special teams had a part in that loss. The tone was set with the first snap. Should have just taken a 2 - 0 loss at that point.
âApathy is the Glove in Which Evil Slips Itâs Handâ.
Key West 1720 115 HP Johnson Saltwater.
I wasnât discounting Seattleâs D but, the defense had nothing to do with poor kick coverage and I am pretty sure they didnât cause a high snap. The D was great, my point was Denver just made matters worse with poor play. If they had played lights out, I still think Seattle would have won but it would have at least been a game worth watching.
âApathy is the Glove in Which Evil Slips Itâs Handâ.
Of course D made a couple stupid mistakes, but that didnât cause the debacle they ended up with. The Hawksâ defence played havock on the opposing team and turned them into jelly.
That Coke commercial made me a Pepsi drinkerâŚ
I think that they should have a âre-doâ. That game wasnât worth watching, and it was a âSuper Lame Bowlâ if anything. Maybe we should have another game in a few weeks and call THAT the super bowlâŚ
Even if âmyâ team isnât in the SB, I pick one and pull for them as if they were my team. Last night it was the HawksâŚand it WAS a good game. Depends on your perspectiveâŚ
Would have been boring if I just wanted to watch a ballgame.
I was pulling for Denver however after the 2nd interception I quit watching .
I DONT HAVE A BOAT
BUT LOVE TO FISH> HINT
WellâŚClemson should have a better defense next year so if defense always beats offense that bodes well for us in death valley in November.
Fear the index finger!
quote:A good game??? Maybe you haven't watched any nail biters. I don't consider it a "good game" when fans check out in the 3rd quarter to watch the bachelor instead of what is supposed to be the biggest sporting event in the world. This certainly will not go down as a classic. I can promise you that...
Originally posted by cape_fishermanEven if âmyâ team isnât in the SB, I pick one and pull for them as if they were my team. Last night it was the HawksâŚand it WAS a good game. Depends on your perspectiveâŚ
Would have been boring if I just wanted to watch a ballgame.
quote:
Originally posted by skinneejquote:A good game??? Maybe you haven't watched any nail biters. I don't consider it a "good game" when fans check out in the 3rd quarter to watch the bachelor instead of what is supposed to be the biggest sporting event in the world. This certainly will not go down as a classic. I can promise you that...
Originally posted by cape_fishermanEven if âmyâ team isnât in the SB, I pick one and pull for them as if they were my team. Last night it was the HawksâŚand it WAS a good game. Depends on your perspectiveâŚ
Would have been boring if I just wanted to watch a ballgame.
A âgood gameâ doesnât have to be a nail biter. You have a small view of sports if thatâs all you believe a good game to be.
A good game can also be a skillful team tearing apart a very formidable foe. I donât give a **** about other fans. They were not in my house watching my tv.
Classic or not, itâll be in the record books as one of the most one-sided games in SB history.
LoL @ people arguing over what they feel like was a waste of time.
Jason, not all good games have to be nail biters. There have been some nail biters like the Patriots games of 2007 and 2012, but Iâd rate this one as exciting just to see 1 team TOTALLY dominate the other.
Iâd rate the Cardinals-Steelers, and the Packers-Steelers games from few years ago as the boring ones.
quote:
Originally posted by shevlinFear the index finger!
Should probably be the middle one
The last pro team that had a defense like the Hawks I remember was the old steel curtain D in Pittsburg. That was a âDâ schoolin. Madden called it right too. 5 times now the #1 O played the #1 D in a superbowl. D vs O 4-1
J Ford
Well I concede that a âgood gameâ is a blowout when you have a dog in the fight (for your team, obviously). That said, of the 110+ million people that watched the super bowl, probably over 100 million of us couldnât care less about either team. We (yeah, Iâm part of that 100 million that doesnât give a crap about Seattle or Denver) want to watch a âgood gameâ meaning a well-fought, tight game where both teams give their best effort.
The Super Bowl wasnât that game. Even a Seattle fan should be able to admit that Denver didnât put their best foot forward. Itâs certainly a fair result on the football field, but itâs not surprising that the casual football fan was channel surfing midway through the third quarter.