That said, and having given you credit for siting a source, I looked into this 12 Up Sports because I had never heard of them. Turns out they are a “Wikipedia” style sports reporting network “featuring authentic and social-first content created by everyday sports fans” and they target “the millennial audience at scale.”
Another hint that they’re ripping off Wikipedia- “Sports fans can create, publish, and distribute their own content, sharing their passion for the game with millions of users. Powered by Hydra, citizen journalists, many of which are social influencers, can create articles, quizzes, slideshows, videos, listicles, and endless other multimedia content to tell the stories behind the game, integrating sports into pop culture.”
I’ll hand it to you though, you had to do some digging to find this little content-lacking nugget. But enough of the lack of credibility of your source. It should not and will not go unnoticed that you actually provided a source to your claim and for that sir, I salute you. Now, let’s work on the quality/credibility of your sources, and their content, and before you know it you’ll actually become a relevant contributor in a conversation. I’m SO proud of you.
Thanks for taking care of the legwork. I felt certain I could get you to handle that. And actually, I look at espn, tigernet, and the related things that pop up here and there on my fb feed. Really thats about all.
Pretty sure you started this thread, so congratulations to you, sir.
Oh, and you’re welcome on the legwork. I figured if you or anyone else wanted a questionable source for questionable information I’d lend a hand. It’s the least I could do.
As a side note, if companies like that are popping up on your FB feed, you might want to check your settings.
The theory of it is that it’s all factual…or is it the fact of it is theoretical? Meh, who are we kidding? It’s not like facts are important to you anyway.
