Tigers 14/coots 4. I’ll take over and under respectively.
Tigers win them ALL next year and USC wins at least 6.
Robert L
Will be interesting to see how Clemson responds to all of the hype surrounding them. Seeing as how they are a dynasty now.
’
Down here is where a signature goes but they can confuse and anger some people so I don’t have one.
Good point Fritz.
Id say 13 for Clemson, 7 for USC.
Clemson 14 Gamehens 5
Boat drinks, Waitress I need 2 more boat drinks!
quote:
Originally posted by CaptFritzWill be interesting to see how Clemson responds to all of the hype surrounding them. Seeing as how they are a dynasty now.
’
Down here is where a signature goes but they can confuse and anger some people so I don’t have one.
Do you consider them a dynasty? If not, could you point out who does think they are a dynasty?
That’s a good start I’m sure. This site has a few as well.
’
Down here is where a signature goes but they can confuse and anger some people so I don’t have one.
quote:
Originally posted by RWLquote:
Originally posted by CaptFritzWill be interesting to see how Clemson responds to all of the hype surrounding them. Seeing as how they are a dynasty now.
Do you consider them a dynasty? If not, could you point out who does think they are a dynasty?
When you have the 5peat, you have indeed, reached dynasty status
Let me guess Fritz…'drop off on d and no leadership ’
quote:
Originally posted by CaptFritzThat’s a good start I’m sure. This site has a few as well.
’
Down here is where a signature goes but they can confuse and anger some people so I don’t have one.
Tigernet doesn’t count for good reasons we all know. Heck, we could probably go to CockyTalk or GamecockCentral and find a Cock fan claiming that they were good last year despite the record. I haven’t seen anyone here say it. With all of the past post you save for later use, you don’t have one that has a poster saying Clemson was a dynasty?
12 for Clemson/ 7 for SC
“When men yield up the privilege of thinking, the last shadow of liberty quits the horizon.” - Thomas Paine