quote:
Originally posted by Fishb8quote:
Originally posted by Edistodanielquote:
Originally posted by Fishb8quote:
Originally posted by EdistodanielYou’re basing your entire rating system on 1 single facet. That’s called not knowing what you’re talking about.
Oh, I can’t wait to here this. Please elaborate.
Well you see, the people that vote on these things know more about football than, “well they ain’t played no SEC teams yet, so them thar wins don’t even count!” You’re basing your entire ranking system on the win/loss record of teams they’ve beaten. That’s called oversimplification. There are things like yards per game (If there are a lot of them, the offense is good. If there’s not a lot of them, the opposing defense is good.) There’s pre-season rankings based on who came back, who was recruited, etc. There’s even just a general feel of how they look, such as having a big ass O-line that pushes people around.
Point is, your argument is the same tired argument every SEC fan always brings up.
Please tell me where anything I said or based any of this on is about the SEC?
I said nothing about conference at all.So please explain yourself…AGAIN?
I will give you a little help, take the glasses off before your reply.
<hr height="1" nosha
Fournette will not get 150 this week. Mark it down!
quote:
Originally posted by 23SailfishA long as he’s not hurt, Fournette will have 150+ against Alabama. You guys must not have seen him play yet… LSU’s line is better than Georgia’s and Chubb couldn’t carry Fournette’s jock strap. No comparison.
Redfish Baron Extraordinaire
quote:
Originally posted by Edistodanielquote:
Originally posted by Fishb8quote:
Originally posted by Edistodanielquote:
Originally posted by Fishb8quote:
Originally posted by EdistodanielYou’re basing your entire rating system on 1 single facet. That’s called not knowing what you’re talking about.
Oh, I can’t wait to here this. Please elaborate.
Well you see, the people that vote on these things know more about football than, “well they ain’t played no SEC teams yet, so them thar wins don’t even count!” You’re basing your entire ranking system on the win/loss record of teams they’ve beaten. That’s called oversimplification. There are things like yards per game (If there are a lot of them, the offense is good. If there’s not a lot of them, the opposing defense is good.) There’s pre-season rankings based on who came back, who was recruited, etc. There’s even just a general feel of how they look, such as having a big ass O-line that pushes people around.
Point is, your argument is the same tired argument every SEC fan always brings up.
Please tell me where anything I said or based any of this on is about the SEC?
I said no
quote:You might want to check that schedule again, RADDADDY...
Originally posted by RADDADDYFournette will not get 150 this week. Mark it down!
quote:
Originally posted by 23SailfishA long as he’s not hurt, Fournette will have 150+ against Alabama. You guys must not have seen him play yet… LSU’s line is better than Georgia’s and Chubb couldn’t carry Fournette’s jock strap. No comparison.
Redfish Baron Extraordinaire
'06 Mckee Craft
184 Marathon
DF140 Suzuki
Yep, playing at LSU definitely changes things.
quote:
Originally posted by tigerfinquote:You might want to check that schedule again, RADDADDY...
Originally posted by RADDADDYFournette will not get 150 this week. Mark it down!
quote:
Originally posted by 23SailfishA long as he’s not hurt, Fournette will have 150+ against Alabama. You guys must not have seen him play yet… LSU’s line is better than Georgia’s and Chubb couldn’t carry Fournette’s jock strap. No comparison.
Redfish Baron Extraordinaire
'06 Mckee Craft
184 Marathon
DF140 Suzuki
quote:
Originally posted by Fishb8quote:
Originally posted by Edistodanielquote:
Originally posted by Fishb8quote:
Originally posted by Edistodanielquote:
Originally posted by Fishb8quote:
Originally posted by EdistodanielYou’re basing your entire rating system on 1 single facet. That’s called not knowing what you’re talking about.
Oh, I can’t wait to here this. Please elaborate.
Well you see, the people that vote on these things know more about football than, “well they ain’t played no SEC teams yet, so them thar wins don’t even count!” You’re basing your entire ranking system on the win/loss record of teams they’ve beaten. That’s called oversimplification. There are things like yards per game (If there are a lot of them, the offense is good. If there’s not a lot of them, the opposing defense is good.) There’s pre-season rankings based on who came back, who was recruited, etc. There’s even just a general feel of how they look, such as having a big ass O-line that pushes people around.
Point is, your argument is the same tired argument every SEC fan always brings up.
<hr h
I will respond one last time.
What is stupid is you think that after a day of coaching their team, that the coach reads stats for 180 plus hours of games. Give me a break. They do something very similar to what I have done. W vs L in conjunction with last week(or pre-season).
shaking my head and mumbling under my breath…this guy thinks after an 8pm game a coach spends hours and hours looking at stats form 60 plus games…SMDH
quote:
Originally posted by RADDADDYYep, playing at LSU definitely changes things.
quote:
Originally posted by tigerfinquote:You might want to check that schedule again, RADDADDY...
Originally posted by RADDADDYFournette will not get 150 this week. Mark it down!
quote:
Originally posted by 23SailfishA long as he’s not hurt, Fournette will have 150+ against Alabama. You guys must not have seen him play yet… LSU’s line is better than Georgia’s and Chubb couldn’t carry Fournette’s jock strap. No comparison.
Redfish Baron Extraordinaire
'06 Mckee Craft
184 Marathon
DF140 Suzuki
You think playing in Columbia would have made a difference?
Redfish Baron Extraordinaire
I don’t, I thought that he thought they(LSU) were playing Bama this week.
'06 Mckee Craft
184 Marathon
DF140 Suzuki
quote:
Originally posted by 23Sailfishquote:
Originally posted by RADDADDYYep, playing at LSU definitely changes things.
quote:
Originally posted by tigerfinquote:You might want to check that schedule again, RADDADDY...
Originally posted by RADDADDYFournette will not get 150 this week. Mark it down!
quote:
Originally posted by 23SailfishA long as he’s not hurt, Fournette will have 150+ against Alabama. You guys must not have seen him play yet… LSU’s line is better than Georgia’s and Chubb couldn’t carry Fournette’s jock strap. No comparison.
Redfish Baron Extraordinaire
'06 Mckee Craft
184 Marathon
DF140 Suzuki
You think playing in Columbia would have made a difference?
Redfish Baron Extraordinaire
It’s probably make a
Absolutely. Call me nuts, but I was predicting that game going down to the wire in Columbia. Now, with a good LSU start at home, Carolina may lay down early. You know the players have to be disappointed.
quote:
Originally posted by 23Sailfishquote:
Originally posted by RADDADDYYep, playing at LSU definitely changes things.
quote:
Originally posted by tigerfinquote:You might want to check that schedule again, RADDADDY...
Originally posted by RADDADDYFournette will not get 150 this week. Mark it down!
quote:
Originally posted by 23SailfishA long as he’s not hurt, Fournette will have 150+ against Alabama. You guys must not have seen him play yet… LSU’s line is better than Georgia’s and Chubb couldn’t carry Fournette’s jock strap. No comparison.
Redfish Baron Extraordinaire
'06 Mckee Craft
184 Marathon
DF140 Suzuki
You think playing in Columbia would have made a difference?
quote:Why would they look at 60 plus games? I can pretty much guarantee that I wouldn't need to check in on Air Force or Bowling Green bursting into the top 25.
Originally posted by Fishb8I will respond one last time.
What is stupid is you think that after a day of coaching their team, that the coach reads stats for 180 plus hours of games. Give me a break. They do something very similar to what I have done. W vs L in conjunction with last week(or pre-season).
shaking my head and mumbling under my breath…this guy thinks after an 8pm game a coach spends hours and hours looking at stats form 60 plus games…SMDH
I think it’s funny that you’re arguing like it’s a fact. If they do something so similar, then why are the top 4 teams ones that, according to you, haven’t played anybody??? I mean according to your single-facet-1-dimensional-any-idiot-with-a-basic-understand-of-addition-and-subtraction ranking method, the top 4 don’t deserve to be there.
Shaking my head while trying not to laugh… this guy has no idea what he’s talking about anymore.