quote:
Originally posted by marshgrassShe will take the same number as Obama has. 0.
Marsha
22 Sea Hunt
There were 552 LEGAL guns confiscated during Katrina…by our LEO and MILITARY.
Don’t say it can’t happen…it already has.
Just look here locally Roof used a Pistol to cause all that damage so the Lib Anti-americans will use him as the excuse to ban all semi-auto weapons period. They are already taxing ammo .22’s used to be about $7.00 for 550 rounds now its $10-$13 dollars for a decent brand of 100 rounds
quote:
Originally posted by 23Sailfishquote:
Originally posted by marshgrassShe will take the same number as Obama has. 0.
Marsha
22 Sea Hunt
There were 552 LEGAL guns confiscated during Katrina…by our LEO and MILITARY.
Don’t say it can’t happen…it already has.
In all fairness, wasn’t this the Bush administration. Marsha is right, Obama and the democrats have taken 0.
“Those who have the ability to make a difference have the responsibility to do so.” Thomas Jefferson
The fact that we should be talking about is that the government has confiscated legal firearms. Given the same circumstances during the Obama administration, what do you think would have happened? The same? More? Less? I don’t know. I just know that is terrifies me personally that in a time of need and desperation, OUR GOVERNMENT disarmed law abiding citizens.
quote:Why did they?
Originally posted by 23Sailfishquote:
Originally posted by marshgrassShe will take the same number as Obama has. 0.
Marsha
22 Sea Hunt
There were 552 LEGAL guns confiscated during Katrina…by our LEO and MILITARY.
Don’t say it can’t happen…it already has.
Was it because the police were worried what they would face when they ordered a force evacuation from people holding out?
quote:
Originally posted by poly ballquote:Why did they?
Originally posted by 23Sailfishquote:
Originally posted by marshgrassShe will take the same number as Obama has. 0.
Marsha
22 Sea Hunt
There were 552 LEGAL guns confiscated during Katrina…by our LEO and MILITARY.
Don’t say it can’t happen…it already has.
Was it because the police were worried what they would face when they ordered a force evacuation from people holding out?
Those confiscations were WRONG! ! What part of “Shall not be infringed” do you fail to understand?
The Dems and socialists want a “nanny” state, where they have cradle to grave control of our lives. If the N.O. people didn’t want to evacuate , They have every right to be stupid! And they have every right to be armed!
quote:
Originally posted by poly ballquote:Why did they?
Originally posted by 23Sailfishquote:
Originally posted by marshgrassShe will take the same number as Obama has. 0.
Marsha
22 Sea Hunt
There were 552 LEGAL guns confiscated during Katrina…by our LEO and MILITARY.
Don’t say it can’t happen…it already has.
Was it because the police were worried what they would face when they ordered a force evacuation from people holding out?
One could assume so, but I don’t know what they were thinking… What would you do if the police or National Guard came to your front door demanding that you leave your home?
Seriously think about that.
What if they deemed a threat was coming that you disagreed with? Would you blindly follow orders or stand your ground?
I’m pretty sure they would find an empty home at my residence. Family, bibles, clothes, supplies, guns, money, and pictures already loaded up with the camper and gone. Assuming we are talking about the same danger. Now, an unknown threat, I would stand my ground and take my chances in my home. If given the decision to let the gubment protect and supply my family over myself. I’ll take my chances at home. We as a country aren’t equipped to properly care for the overwhelming majority of people in this country that can’t do jack squat for themselves. No way I am getting drug down and rationed with the rest of them.
“Wailord”
1979 17’ Montauk
90 Johnson
Wilderness Ride 115
I have no obligation to speak to the police. The first time I heard something I disagreed with I would exercise my right to remain silent. Of course I would stand my ground. If I was asked to turn over my weapons I would not.
quote:If they were coming to tell me to evacuate, I most likely would have been gone. No property I own is more valuable than life, and I have a place to evacuate safely.
Originally posted by 23Sailfishquote:
Originally posted by poly ballquote:Why did they?
Originally posted by 23Sailfishquote:
Originally posted by marshgrassShe will take the same number as Obama has. 0.
Marsha
22 Sea Hunt
There were 552 LEGAL guns confiscated during Katrina…by our LEO and MILITARY.
Don’t say it can’t happen…it already has.
Was it because the police were worried what they would face when they ordered a force evacuation from people holding out?
One could assume so, but I don’t know what they were thinking… What would you do if the police or National Guard came to your front door demanding that you leave your home?
Seriously think about that.
What if they deemed a threat was coming that you disagreed with? Would you blindly follow orders or stand your ground?
A place like New Orleans that
She’s willing to pay you
just a plank in their platform
California’s plan coming to a town near you?
http://www.bradycampaign.org/our-impact/success-stories/governor-brown-signs-ab-1014
What happens when you have a vindictive spouse or neighbor?
First ever workplace violence incident, Wounded Knee,SD.
quote:
Originally posted by marshgrassShe will take the same number as Obama has. 0.
Marsha
22 Sea Hunt
Thanks for an answer Marsha. If I had been more specific and said " which ones will she try to take, maybe not physically but by making them illegal", would your answer be the same?
I think if Hillary gets elected, then, well…nothing will change. The NRA and it’s lobbying power don’t automatically dissolve if a dem is elected 3 times in a row.
quote:
Originally posted by EdistodanielI think if Hillary gets elected, then, well…nothing will change. The NRA and it’s lobbying power don’t automatically dissolve if a dem is elected 3 times in a row.
Ed, if nothing changes … then a lot will continue to change.
“If Bruce Jenner can keep his wiener and be called a woman, I can keep my firearms and be considered disarmed.”
So are you dems saying she won’t go for guns, or won’t be successful? Magazines?
quote:
Originally posted by poly ballquote:Correct Marsha. Don is so full of internal waste, his eyes are brown....
Originally posted by marshgrassShe will take the same number as Obama has. 0.
Marsha
22 Sea Hunt
http://www.■■■■■■■■■.org/2016/05/trump-distorts-clintons-gun-stance/
Two months ago, in Orlando, a man armed with an assault-style rifle killed at least 50 people and wounded 53 others in a crowded nightclub.
Six months ago, in San Bernardino, Calif., a man and woman armed with assault-style rifles killed 14 people and wounded 20 others at a holiday party.
In 2012, in Aurora, Colo., a man armed with an assault-style rifle killed 12 people and wounded 58 others in a crowded movie theater.
Also in 2012, in Newtown Conn., a man armed with an assault-style rifle killed 28 people and wounded 2 others at an elementary school.
On the other hand, compared to other firearms, assault-style rifles make it fairly easy to kill or injure many people in within a short period of time. So perpetrators wishing to inflict indiscriminate harm on a large crowd of people often turn to them. Of the 10 mass shooting incidents with the highest number of casualties — killed AND wounded — in the U.S., seven involved the use of an assault-style rifle, according to Mother Jones’s database.
And everyday hundreds of thousands American citizens possess these same types of firearms and do not injure or kill anyone. So the government should penalize all of those citizens due to the actions of a few? If you answer yes, think of other ways that logic can be applied.
quote:What do you define as "Going for guns?"
Originally posted by 7csSo are you dems saying she won’t go for guns, or won’t be successful? Magazines?
I think there will always be the hard left that wants to ban everything, and the hard right wants everyone to be able to drive an M1A1 Abrams to work every day. Clinton falls closer to center left. I don’t think there will be any successful attempt at removing “assault weapons” or higher capacity mags, but there probably will be some moves for more restrictive background checks. Try and keep crazy people away from guns type of stuff.
I see so many Moms say they want to ban guns so their kids will be safe. That they don’t want to worry about there kids playing at a house where a father has guns, or some crazy person shooting up the mall while they are there.
I think these same people driving around with their cell phone glued in their hands are more of a danger than my guns sitting in my safe at home.
“Wailord”
1979 17’ Montauk
90 Johnson
Wilderness Ride 115
quote:
I don't think there will be any successful attempt at removing "assault weapons" or higher capacity mags
They already have in several states.
quote:
probably will be some moves for more restrictive background checks. Try and keep crazy people away from guns type of stuff.
Background checks have been the law for the last 45 years that I’ve been an adult in GA. Criminals don’t get weapons through legitimate gun shops or have background checks run on firearm purchases, or care what new law is passed. Laws will only effect honest people anyway.
Capt. Larry Teuton
Swamp Worshiper
What criminal or terrorist worries about breaking laws? This is how backwards liberals are, any new gun laws on top of the hundreds already on the books, effect one group of people only- people on here, the law abiding. I kinda of think they actually understand this but use that we need new laws because of shootings/terrorism to achieve their real goal, which is to disarm us and put us at the mercy of the government for protection from criminals who will never follow nor care about the laws. Make sense?