Do I hear this correctly. Experienced coach? Imagine how bad that ‘wet behind the ears’ coach will stomp your new prized Muschamp in nov 2016. Its going to be comical.
You Tater Haters and Homers sure are fun to watch.
I’m still enjoying Monday night. The Tigers put 40 points on the best team the SEC has ever had. We made a few errors, gave up 2 dumb TDs and STILL ONLY lost the game by 5 points.
Coker is having nightmares about Kevin Dodd.
Go Tigers
Boat drinks, Waitress I need 2 more boat drinks!
quote:Envy
Originally posted by 23Sailfish
“Living’s mostly wasting time and I’ll waste my share of mine”
quote:Losing by 5 points has no merit. Remember when you beat the Gamecocks by 5 points?
Originally posted by Too BusyYou Tater Haters and Homers sure are fun to watch.
I’m still enjoying Monday night. The Tigers put 40 points on the best team the SEC has ever had. We made a few errors, gave up 2 dumb TDs and STILL ONLY lost the game by 5 points.
Coker is having nightmares about Kevin Dodd.
Go Tigers
Boat drinks, Waitress I need 2 more boat drinks!
’
Down here is where a signature goes but they can confuse and anger some people so I don’t have one.
#1- How did he lose the locker room?
#2- Who is talking about South Carolina?
#3- Cu vs South Carolina is a heated rivalry so it will always be in focus
quote:
Originally posted by archerClemson just played a hell of a game FOR A NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP and yet their fans are still leading the charge in this irrelevant “rivalry” against USC??? This type of mentality is why Clemson will never be a household name when it comes to national title talk. They’re too busy focusing on state championships and an irrelevant rivalry. Your success is as limited by your goals and focus as it is your talent and abilities. Considering Clemson always puts talent on the football field, that pretty much leaves focus and goals as the limiting factors.
Spurrier came in with the right focus. He was less worried about beating Clemson and more focused on winning a conference title. His focus, at least early on, was right but he wasn’t putting the talent on the field the way Clemson does year in and year out. Say what you want to about Spurrier, his coaching records stands for itself and he will go down as one of the greatest college coaches ever. The way he coached and the offense he put on the field at Florida changed the landscape of college football. I saw nothing wrong with his departure or its timing. What was there to gain by him staying here? He had already lost the locker room, recruits were de-committing, they weren’t going to become bowl eligible. It bottomed out so he did what he needed to do and got our of the way so Tanner could do his job and the team could move on. He is USC’s winningest coach in the program’s history. He owes nobody nothing. He is the reason USC football is even talked about at all. The qualoity of football being played at a school should be why a program is talked about, not its coach. Muschamp has his work cut out for him.
Back to Clemson fans though, y’all should
quote:Do you guys actually understand the concept of recruiting?
Originally posted by harrydDo I hear this correctly. Experienced coach? Imagine how bad that ‘wet behind the ears’ coach will stomp your new prized Muschamp in nov 2016. Its going to be comical.
quote:Remind me who Clemson played in the ACC "Championship" game? Was it that same blue team that got beaten by a crappy 3-9 Carolina team? Yes, I think it was...
Originally posted by CaptFritzquote:Losing by 5 points has no merit. Remember when you beat the Gamecocks by 5 points?
Originally posted by Too BusyYou Tater Haters and Homers sure are fun to watch.
I’m still enjoying Monday night. The Tigers put 40 points on the best team the SEC has ever had. We made a few errors, gave up 2 dumb TDs and STILL ONLY lost the game by 5 points.
Coker is having nightmares about Kevin Dodd.
Go Tigers
Boat drinks, Waitress I need 2 more boat drinks!
’
Down here is where a signature goes but they can confuse and anger some people so I don’t have one.
If we played Bama 10 times, we’d win 9.
“Wailord”
1979 17’ Montauk
90 Johnson
Wilderness Ride 115
quote:Skinnyjay is pulling a Fritz, only difference is Fritz is a real sports fan.
Originally posted by PhinThere is no need to address these coots anymore y’all.
Skinnyjay is simply trying to stir up Tigers fans, as I don’t think he even knows how the game of football is actually played.
Johnny come lately, carry on.
quote:
Originally posted by skinneejquote:Remind me who Clemson played in the ACC "Championship" game? Was it that same blue team that got beaten by a crappy 3-9 Carolina team? Yes, I think it was...
Originally posted by CaptFritzquote:Losing by 5 points has no merit. Remember when you beat the Gamecocks by 5 points?
Originally posted by Too BusyYou Tater Haters and Homers sure are fun to watch.
I’m still enjoying Monday night. The Tigers put 40 points on the best team the SEC has ever had. We made a few errors, gave up 2 dumb TDs and STILL ONLY lost the game by 5 points.
Coker is having nightmares about Kevin Dodd.
Go Tigers
Boat drinks, Waitress I need 2 more boat drinks!
’
Down here is where a signature goes but they can confuse and anger some people so I don’t have one.
You should give this a try. It’ll help
Be sure to get the large size so you have some for next year too.
Boat drinks, Waitress I need 2 more boat drinks!
quote:All I know is that Shaq Lawson is the best tackler since Joe Montana. That, and Discount Double-check.
Originally posted by poly ballquote:Skinnyjay is pulling a Fritz, only difference is Fritz is a real sports fan.
Originally posted by PhinThere is no need to address these coots anymore y’all.
Skinnyjay is simply trying to stir up Tigers fans, as I don’t think he even knows how the game of football is actually played.
Johnny come lately, carry on.
quote:
Originally posted by RADDADDY#1- How did he lose the locker room?
#2- Who is talking about South Carolina?
#3- Cu vs South Carolina is a heated rivalry so it will always be in focusquote:
Originally posted by archerClemson just played a hell of a game FOR A NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP and yet their fans are still leading the charge in this irrelevant “rivalry” against USC??? This type of mentality is why Clemson will never be a household name when it comes to national title talk. They’re too busy focusing on state championships and an irrelevant rivalry. Your success is as limited by your goals and focus as it is your talent and abilities. Considering Clemson always puts talent on the football field, that pretty much leaves focus and goals as the limiting factors.
Spurrier came in with the right focus. He was less worried about beating Clemson and more focused on winning a conference title. His focus, at least early on, was right but he wasn’t putting the talent on the field the way Clemson does year in and year out. Say what you want to about Spurrier, his coaching records stands for itself and he will go down as one of the greatest college coaches ever. The way he coached and the offense he put on the field at Florida changed the landscape of college football. I saw nothing wrong with his departure or its timing. What was there to gain by him staying here? He had already lost the locker room, recruits were de-committing, they weren’t going to become bowl eligible. It bottomed out so he did what he needed to do and got our of the way so Tanner could do his job and the team could move on. He is USC’s winningest coach in the program’s history. He owes nobody nothing. He is the reason USC football is even talked about at all. The qualoity of footbal
In 2015, was Bama/Auburn irrelevant? How about Ohio State/Michigan? The only thing that made the rivalry irrelevant in 2015 was Carolina’s poor performance and ranking. The lack of interest nationally is because of the non-tradition in football for Carolina. Spurrier built then killed a program in record fashion. When both schools were/are in the top 25, the rivalry is VERY relevant. We shall see if Carolina can rebuild and BECOME relevant once again. Otherwise, it’s just good rivalry fun.
quote:
Originally posted by archerquote:
Originally posted by RADDADDY#1- How did he lose the locker room?
#2- Who is talking about South Carolina?
#3- Cu vs South Carolina is a heated rivalry so it will always be in focusquote:
Originally posted by archerClemson just played a hell of a game FOR A NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP and yet their fans are still leading the charge in this irrelevant “rivalry” against USC??? This type of mentality is why Clemson will never be a household name when it comes to national title talk. They’re too busy focusing on state championships and an irrelevant rivalry. Your success is as limited by your goals and focus as it is your talent and abilities. Considering Clemson always puts talent on the football field, that pretty much leaves focus and goals as the limiting factors.
Spurrier came in with the right focus. He was less worried about beating Clemson and more focused on winning a conference title. His focus, at least early on, was right but he wasn’t putting the talent on the field the way Clemson does year in and year out. Say what you want to about Spurrier, his coaching records stands for itself and he
I applaud your optimism that you think USC/Clemson is on par with or on the same national stage as Bama/Auburn, OSU/Michigan. I don’t disagree that USC isn’t very relevant on the national stage but if we’re being honest, it’s not like Clemson is always in the picture. Yes, Clemson is a far more talented team and much more relevant team than USC but again, Clemson, aside from this year and distant ancient history, isn’t a regular participant among those mentioned in national title contention year in and year out.
USC’s relevance has nothing to with national interested. The Clemson/USC rivalry was no bigger of a deal, nationally, when USC was #10 amd Clemson was #6 in 2013. One team in that rivalry isn’t what drives its relevance. The fact that the game rarely, if ever, has any bearing on the national stage is a huge contributing factor. Plus, the fact that neither program is considered a “storied program” by the prognosticators is also a contributing factor as to why no one, other than graduates of either school and/or people from SC, really cares about that rivalry.
That’s my point when I say I don’t understand why Clemson fans, given their team’s current status, worries themselves with talking smack to USC fans or taking the bait from them. Clemson’s record in this “rivalry” is beyond lopsided (67-42-4). The highest either team was ranked during their state championship game was in 2013 when Clemson was ranked #6 and USC was #10 (granted the rankings changed a little after that game). It’s like a high school senior taking a 6th grader’s milk money. Yeah, there’s something to brag about but again, if that’s what you value the most, beating USC, then may you live long and prosper among your 67 state championships. I for one would have higher aspirations.
In the future, where every stranger poses a potential threat, knowing the predator mindset is the only safe haven.
Xpress H20B Bay Series
Yamaha 115 SHO
How long do you think it takes for Auburn, Michigan, Florida (getting better), Nebraska (suck, already there) Texas, Miami (already there) etc. when out of the Top 25 for their rival game to become nationally irrelevant? Nobody cares when 1 team (or both) sucks over a long period. The Clemson/Carolina game was on a direct path to BECOMING more nationally relevant. Now, not so much. That is why it is great for both schools to have strong programs.
quote:
Originally posted by archerI applaud your optimism that you think USC/Clemson is on par with or on the same national stage as Bama/Auburn, OSU/Michigan. I don’t disagree that USC isn’t very relevant on the national stage but if we’re being honest, it’s not like Clemson is always in the picture. Yes, Clemson is a far more talented team and much more relevant team than USC but again, Clemson, aside from this year and distant ancient history, isn’t a regular participant among those mentioned in national title contention year in and year out.
USC’s relevance has nothing to with national interested. The Clemson/USC rivalry was no bigger of a deal, nationally, when USC was #10 amd Clemson was #6 in 2013. One team in that rivalry isn’t what drives its relevance. The fact that the game rarely, if ever, has any bearing on the national stage is a huge contributing factor. Plus, the fact that neither program is considered a “storied program” by the prognosticators is also a contributing factor as to why no one, other than graduates of either school and/or people from SC, really cares about that rivalry.
That’s my point when I say I don’t understand why Clemson fans, given their team’s current status, worries themselves with talking smack to USC fans or taking the bait from them. Clemson’s record in this “rivalry” is beyond lopsided (67-42-4). The highest either team was ranked during their state championship game was in 2013 when Clemson
Probably a junior taking a 3rd grader’s lunch money. Point taken
Boat drinks, Waitress I need 2 more boat drinks!
I want the gamecoots to win every game except against Clemson; just so the record’s clear for everyone.
http://www.sustainablefishing.org/
www.marshtackycarbon.com
Luke 8:22-25
quote:
Originally posted by RADDADDYHow long do you think it takes for Auburn, Michigan, Florida (getting better), Nebraska (suck, already there) Texas, Miami (already there) etc. when out of the Top 25 for their rival game to become nationally irrelevant? Nobody cares when 1 team (or both) sucks over a long period. The Clemson/Carolina game was on a direct path to BECOMING more nationally relevant. Now, not so much. That is why it is great for both schools to have strong programs.
quote:
Originally posted by archerI applaud your optimism that you think USC/Clemson is on par with or on the same national stage as Bama/Auburn, OSU/Michigan. I don’t disagree that USC isn’t very relevant on the national stage but if we’re being honest, it’s not like Clemson is always in the picture. Yes, Clemson is a far more talented team and much more relevant team than USC but again, Clemson, aside from this year and distant ancient history, isn’t a regular participant among those mentioned in national title contention year in and year out.
USC’s relevance has nothing to with national interested. The Clemson/USC rivalry was no bigger of a deal, nationally, when USC was #10 amd Clemson was #6 in 2013. One team in that rivalry isn’t what drives its relevance. The fact that the game rarely, if ever, has any bearing on the national stage is a huge contributing factor. Plus, the fact that neither program is considered a “storied program” by the prognosticators is also a contributing factor as to why no one, other than graduates of either school and/or people from SC, really cares about that rivalry.
That’s my point when I say I don’t understand why Clemson fans, given their team’s current status, worries themselves with talking smack to USC fans or taking the bait from th
Clemson and Carolina have a great rivalry. For you to say the only rivalry games that matter are the ones that have NC sway is ridiculous. How many years does any 1 rivalry game have much meaning in the NC picture? There are a few each year but not many. If you don’t think it is a nationally recognized rivalry, please list your top 10 most recognized rivalries in college football.
quote:
Originally posted by archerquote:
Originally posted by RADDADDYHow long do you think it takes for Auburn, Michigan, Florida (getting better), Nebraska (suck, already there) Texas, Miami (already there) etc. when out of the Top 25 for their rival game to become nationally irrelevant? Nobody cares when 1 team (or both) sucks over a long period. The Clemson/Carolina game was on a direct path to BECOMING more nationally relevant. Now, not so much. That is why it is great for both schools to have strong programs.
quote:
Originally posted by archerI applaud your optimism that you think USC/Clemson is on par with or on the same national stage as Bama/Auburn, OSU/Michigan. I don’t disagree that USC isn’t very relevant on the national stage but if we’re being honest, it’s not like Clemson is always in the picture. Yes, Clemson is a far more talented team and much more relevant team than USC but again, Clemson, aside from this year and distant ancient history, isn’t a regular participant among those mentioned in national title contention year in and year out.
USC’s relevance has nothing to with national interested. The Clemson/USC rivalry was no bigger of a deal, nationally, when USC was #10 amd Clemson was #6 in 2013. One team in that rivalry isn’t