He had 3500 yds after the ACC CG you genius. That’s 15 games of stats you are looking at. He needs 233 yds in 2 games to match his yds before the Heisman from last year.
“Wailord”
1979 17’ Montauk
90 Johnson
Wilderness Ride 115
And its only 825 yds, not 1000. Rounding up shows your obvious bias.
“Wailord”
1979 17’ Montauk
90 Johnson
Wilderness Ride 115
“~” means roughly. and 825 or 1000. neither would be possible
quote:
Originally posted by Fishb8“~” means roughly. and 825 or 1000. neither would be possible
He threw for 580s vs pitt. What isn’t possible?
First, Most, Biggest
So you are saying he can’t throw for 825 yards in 4 Games?
Or he can’t cover 233 yds. in 2?
“Wailord”
1979 17’ Montauk
90 Johnson
Wilderness Ride 115
I think 400 should be expected Saturday.
So B8 opens his mouth and shows he doesn’t know what he is talking about, and then disappears once again.
“Wailord”
1979 17’ Montauk
90 Johnson
Wilderness Ride 115
History leans toward that statement lately. That or you have a once in a lifetime game against a larger than life opponent very late in the season. I.E Johnny Football. Having a larger than life meltdown, against a low opponent, very late in the season does not overcome not being on a championship team. It was more in jest to everyone’s favorite. Not saying it isn’t possible to be considered “just because.”
“Wailord”
1979 17’ Montauk
90 Johnson
Wilderness Ride 115
quote:
Originally posted by GeronimoSo B8 opens his mouth and shows he doesn’t know what he is talking about, and then disappears once again.
“Wailord”
1979 17’ Montauk
90 JohnsonWilderness Ride 115
1st of all I rarely open my mouth about things I dont know about.
2nd, I didnt disappear, I have #$%# to do.
3rd, You are correct I was using the total number for the 2015 year instead of the numbers just for the regular season. In that respect, I believe he may be ahead of last year.
Anyone got a meme of Jackson fumbling the Heisman on the goal line Saturday?
“Wailord”
1979 17’ Montauk
90 Johnson
Wilderness Ride 115
quote:
Originally posted by CaptFritzHow about the fact your conference championship could possibly have an unranked team playing for it?
’
Down here is where a signature goes but they can confuse and anger some people so I don’t have one.
A bit tricky happy, eh?
“Wailord”
1979 17’ Montauk
90 Johnson
Wilderness Ride 115
My vote would still be for Jackson. I think he is the best overall player. Plus I think he means more to his team than any other person in the race.
quote:
Originally posted by Fishb8My vote would still be for Jackson. I think he is the best overall player. Plus I think he means more to his team than any other person in the race.
I think you pick Jackson because he whines like you do… Just my opinion though!!
One Simple Thanks!!
http://www.militaryappreciationday.org
I know nothing about him whining. Never seen an interview with him. Only seen him play.
Jackson is a phenomenal talent. 1500 yards rushing by a quarterback is reason enough for the H award, but put 51 touchdowns with it, and it’s a no brainer. As I understand it he is an excellent student, and has the utmost respect of his coach’s and team mates. Watson is a Heisman caliber talent. I hope he gets invited to the ceremony, and can take his family on another vacation to NYC. He’s not going to win the trophy, but I would suggest that his talent will be rewarded quite handsomely on NFL draft day. Watson has been a godsend for Clemson, and that’s all that really matters. He won’t be paying for dinner in the UpState, or the LowCountry for the rest of his life!
quote:
Originally posted by Fishb8My vote would still be for Jackson. I think he is the best overall player. Plus I think he means more to his team than any other person in the race.
Fish, best overall I really cant argue with. Meaning more to his team than any other person, I disagree. Meaning more to a team that’s 9-3 and not competing for a division title, much less a conference or national, doesn’t mean much to me. Considering that, I don’t believe he is more important to his team than DW. I don’t think Clemson would be in contention to play for a Nat Champ without him. Considering that, and his performance over the last four games (esp compared to Jackson’s), I see it far differently. Best player, maybe not. Most outstanding all things considered, I believe so. I do think one of us will be right soon.
Clemson would have 4 losses without Watson. Louisville would be 500 I would guess without Jackson. I think Watson and Jackson are equally important to their respective teams. That being said, Jackson’s numbers are ridiculous while its evident Watson has slowed down his efforts this year in order to save himself for the NFL. I’d vote for Jackson first, Clemson bias and all.
quote:
Originally posted by CaptFritzYou can’t spell Pathetic Conference without ACC
’
Down here is where a signature goes but they can confuse and anger some people so I don’t have one.
The ACC is 10-3 the over the last 3 years on rivalry weekend. Let that simmer for a little while, and then decide what conference is pathetic. LOL
02’ Seapro 17’CC w/ 90 yamaha 2stroke
quote:
Originally posted by Clem1984quote:
Originally posted by CaptFritzYou can’t spell Pathetic Conference without ACC
’
Down here is where a signature goes but they can confuse and anger some people so I don’t have one.
The ACC is 10-3 the over the last 3 years on rivalry weekend. Let that simmer for a little while, and then decide what conference is pathetic. LOL
02’ Seapro 17’CC w/ 90 yamaha 2stroke
*But it’s only the SEC East
Boat drinks, Waitress I need 2 more boat drinks!
ESPN really doesn’t have a high opinion of the SEC East.
