How can USC jr have a 50 year head start and do nothing in football as compared to USC?
Because they sucked from the very beginning?
Mark
Pioneer 222 Sportfish Yamaha F300
Yeah, but do you consider a dog to be a filthy animal? I wouldn’t go so far as to call a dog filthy but they’re definitely dirty. But, a dog’s got personality. Personality goes a long way.
“Life’s tough…It’s even tougher if you’re stupid” John Wayne
How can USC jr have a 50 year head start and do nothing in football as compared to USC?
Wow, this is one of the dumbest things I’ve ever read. But this logic only programs that have a long long history should be good. Like Clemson for instance. The are older that FSU…but yet FSU has more natty…
Oh, Got it.
How can Clemson have a 50 year head start and do nothing in football as compared to FSU.
Let’s dumb it down - How about any type football championships?
I believe I know why Hoppy specified “football championships.” It’s because USC, as a university, has more “Natty’s” than Clemson.
Which ones matter?
Did I say you can come out today?
All of them. Otherwise they wouldn’t exist. Here’s a better question…which ones count?
As far as your last question, I couldn’t find an anything in writing where you said I had to go anywhere. I know, it probably got lost in the shuffle amongst the other article you never found.
Good gracious B8. You are an incredibly easy target. Nationally, hardly anyone identifies USC with South Carolina. On a more pertinent note, developing players is the most important part of building a successful program which starts soon with the new recruits. Is Boom capable? Dabo built this BEAST with <3.5 star talent on average.
If they all mattered most people would know what they are. I bet 99.9999% of coot fans couldn’t name half of their other natty’s.
First, Most, Biggest
A person’s comprehension capability isn’t the determining factor of something’s existence or validity. Plus, denial isn’t a river in Egypt.
“…be a man and PM me.”
If nobody cares enough to know about them they might as well be participation trophies that you gave to yourself.
First, Most, Biggest
If “nobody” cared about them, they wouldn’t keep count. You’re missing the operative word, “nobody.” Obviously somebody does because they bother to keep count. Don’t let you emotions (or your bias) cloud facts. I mean, if this were a matter of following biases and emotions, I would throw it out there that my woeful Terps have more Natty’s (29) than Clemson and USC combined, but they’re not part of this conversation.
Geronimo, you’re right, Clemson has more men’s titles but obviously that’s not “all that matters.” Sure, it’s all you want to acknowledge because you can’t stand the thought of not being ahead of USC at something but surely someone of your political stance won’t disregard the women’s movement.
Bang, you know exactly what I mean when I say “nobody”. There’s an insignificant amount of people that know about a USC women’s equestrian, bass fishing championship, or basket weaving. I’m sure some of the championships you are referencing might be more obscure than intramural championships on campus. And you can be proud of the women’s championships as much as you want but the cold hard truth is that their sports (except for MAYBE WBB and that’s a long shot) exist solely because of title 9. They are funded almost completely by football and men’s basketball aka the significant sports. They are so insignificant the government forced them to exist.
If you don’t believe me go around at USC or Maryland and ask who won the 1985 chess national championship or 1977 badminton championship. Then follow that up with “would you trade a women’s basketball championship for a SEC championship in football?”. With it not even being a natty I think you would get an overwhelming amount of fans wanting only football wins.
But hey man you keep telling yourself that everybody is jealous of that three legged race championship in 1955.